|
The following statement drew heated debate after renowned Florida Politician spoke these words: """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Why in the world various groups and figures around the world are trying to outlaw the production and possession of video and photos featuring girls playing and posing in bikini's and skirts, I'll never understand. I mean let's think about this, folks: What sort of harmless outlet are we, as a society, prepared to offer pedophiles who use this sort of material to quell their sexual desires? I've pondered the following questions and have given my angle on things. You all should do the same. 1.) Is it possible to rid the world of pedophiles? I believe not. 2.) Is it possible to end a peds' sexual attraction to children? I say "Not even if you castrate him". 2.) Is it prudent to try and use government powers to locate, and/or test, every earth citizen to determine who's a pedophile and who's not, and to then attempt to either incarcerate, castrate, or execute them all? I answer this with more questions: Would it not be typical for such a procedure to be without it's many errors, and therefore cause for many non-pedophiles to be branded a pedophile? And would not such an error further add to the mass-chaos that would already be in place, in such a future where we followed through with such Nazi-like police-state efforts to cleanse the human race? 3.) Are "the stars" of the videos and photos (mentioned above), by posing and playing in their bikinis, truly being harmed, as opposed to the many young people, worldwide, who suffer from sexual assualt and/or rape, etc.? Or is it more our ideological sensibilities that are the thing being harmed, by letting such productions to exist? The real question here, I believe, is as follows: Is it better that we turn a blind eye to this sort of material, as opposed to continuing on the path we're on; a path where we are imagining that outlawing such material will end a demand for it? And now I ask - Isn't it better that such a potentially-harmful genre of entertainment remain legal (above the table) where it can be monitored and regulated for safety assurance, rather than outlawing it and forcing it underground where restraints and safety regs cannot be applied AT ALL? Friends; by outlawing it, we force it underground and assure true abuse to come to "the stars" of such productions. But keeping it legal, we assure safety regs are followed and less children suffer abuse. This is the harsh reality of the situation, folks. But to continue simply insisting it must be outlawed, and giving no further thought to the subject, is essentially to turn a blind eye to much abuse that will result from your ignorance. We need to face realty and choose the lesser of two evils (so to speak). We mustn't delude ourselves to thinking a demand can ever die. We've already established it cannot, since pedophilia is, always was, and always will be, on the planet, as long as humans beings are on it. Thinking the demand can be ended, is only to assure a Nazi-like police-state to come into place throughout the entire world, where officers and soldiers can enter anyones home at any time without a warrant, by simply claiming that they are investigating child abuse/child pronography/etc. The government is and will continue using any means to gain more and more control and authority over your private lives. And current "best-seller" ploys they are using, are, for example, "the welfare/safety of children", "terorizm", and you-name-it (I'm sure you can think of some more). But children and terorizm are currently the governments best ploys to get you to give up your freedoms for security. They scare you by saying "teror alert - Severe/High", or "Pedo's are on every corner and in every chat room", etc. 4.) What has always been the main purpose of erotic videography and photography (this obviously includes the sea of "adult stores" we allow to stay up and running, across the world), if not for quelling the sexual frustrations of those who choose (for whatever reason) not to pursue real-life sexual contact? And furthermore, Are not these young girls posing and playing in skirts and bikinis serving the same ends? Are they not keeping the pedophile sexually satisfied, thereby causing for less sexual frustration in him, thereby causing the predatorial among peds, to not have as much of a need to find real-life prey? Are we not causing for less violence to occur, by allowing pedophiles to have a virtual outlet for their fantasies to be realized? Note: Video games where one can kill people, is legal. It is legal because it is seen as allowing the beast within us to be released in a harmless outlet; in a virtual world where no one is actually being harmed. Some who are against violence advocate for the outlawing of such video games. But they do not succeed for the same reasons the people trying to outlaw girl-model productions are not succeeding. And what is that reason you may be thinking? It is that both serve to quell natural (but socially unacceptable) human desires. It's absurd that cartoon cp is already virtually outlawed. Cartoon cp allows for no real person to even have to be involved, and should therefore obviously remain legal. """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" P.S. In case you haven't figured it out yet, I'm that Politician in Saturdays private conference. Except no conference ever took place and no polotician am I. But it would be nice to hear that I big-dog politician made such points. |